[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: how does GRUB read from /boot on software-RAID partition?



On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:14:54 -0500
"Barclay, Daniel" <daniel@fgm.com> wrote:

> Jack Schneider wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:21:23 -0500
> > "Barclay, Daniel" <daniel@fgm.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> >>> Barclay, Daniel wrote:
> ...
> >>>> ... is GRUB taking advantage of the fact that the RAID metadata
> >>>> is written at the end of a partition ...
> >> ...
> >>>> If so, how reliable is that?
> >>>>
> >>>> Should one put /boot on a plain, non-RAID partition on one disk
> >>>> and ...maintain a backup /boot partition on 
> >>>> the second disk, or is it fine to put /boot on a mirrored
> >>>> partition (so maintaining redundancy is automatic) and let GRUB
> >>>> read the partition directly?
> >>> ... why make things more complicated and not automatic?
> >> ...  I _am_ trying to avoid the
> >> complicated and non-automatic solution (trying to check whether the
> >> simpler solution is reliable).
> ...
> 
> > Hi, Daniel et al
> > 
> > The following is an outline of my setup on a couple of the system
> > disks.
> > 
> > Roughly I have two md devices for the host system, md0 & md1:
> > 
> > jack@host:~$ df -m
> > Filesystem           1M-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
> > /dev/md0                  9389      7157      1755  81% /
> > tmpfs                     4005         1      4005   1% /lib/init/rw
> > udev                        10         1        10   2% /dev
> > tmpfs                     4005         0      4005   0% /dev/shm
> > /dev/dm-0                40318     11628     26642  31% /home
> > /dev/dm-4                19686     15356      3331
> > 83% /home/jack/XP_VDI /dev/dm-6                30238      7453
> > 21250  26% /home/jack/suse /dev/dm-2                 3024
> > 70      2802   3% /tmp /dev/dm-1                 8064
> > 3426      4229  45% /var /dev/hda                    90
> > 90         0 100% /media/cdrom0
> > 
> > The only concern I have is that / is marginally small. It's
> > expandable tho. 
> >  /boot is just on /mdo. I have run without incident for over a year.
> 
> But if you haven't had any disk-failure incidents, do you know whether
> your setup will reliably work if either disk fails?  (Did you mean
> that you simulated disk failure?)
> 
> 
> 
> Daniel
Hi, Daniel

Sorry, no failures to date.  My thinking was since I was running testing
I didn't want updates/bugs/my ineptitude to trash my data and other
OS. This config allows me to change easily... of course I'm a Debian
nooby.  I can boot from either disk. I pulled a sata cable from one.

Jack
-- 


Reply to: