[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: kernel naming conventions?



Just one more querry I installed the i386 netinstall etch same kernel as below but uname -all shows i686. Care to elaborate?

-----Original Message-----
From: Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <bss@iguanasuicide.net>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 4:41 am
Subject: Re: kernel naming conventions?

On Wednesday 2009 January 14 11:18:31 Kent West wrote:
It used to be that the kernels were named something like
"kernel-image-2.6.24...".

In Sarge and before, IIRC.

Four questions:

1. Why the change from "kernel-image..." to "linux-image..."?

While Linux is a kernel, not all kernels are Linux. In particular there are unfinished ports of Debian to kFreeBSD and GNU HURD, they would provide a
package named like freebsd-kernel-image... or hurd-image...

2. What is "-xen" and "-vserver" and what happened to just plain "-686"
with the 2.6.18 and 2.6.24 kernels?

-xen kernels have support for running as a dom0 under the Xen hypervisor. -vserver kernels are similar for VServer technology, but I'm not familiar with
it.

What do you mean "What happened"? Based on your listing there is a -686 for
each kernel version that has a -xen (e.g.).

3. How can I tell my aptitude-search command to list wider columns to
see the entire name.

IIRC, pipe it to cat; when stdout isn't a terminal it ignores the COLUMNS
environment variable.

4. What's the difference between, say, "linux-image-2.6" and
"linux-image-2.6-686" and "linux-image-2.6.18-6-686"?

linux-image-2.6 is an empty package that depends on "the latest"
linux-image-2.6.*-* package. linux-image-2.6-686 is similar but requires a *-686 package. linux-image-2.6.18-6-686 package contains version 2.6.18 of the Linux kernel, Debian revision 6, compiled for 686 and better processors.
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.                     ,= ,-_-. =.
bss@iguanasuicide.net                     ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy           `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.net/                      \_/



Reply to: