[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [OT] mailing lists versus usenet / reply to list, reply-to, reply

On Monday 2009 January 05 16:20:14 Moderation Robot wrote:
> From: Ken Teague <"kteague at pobox dot com"@giganews.com>
> Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> > I believe the (quite valid) suggestion to ditch Gmail is because it
> > does not have a 'reply to list function'. Well, there are several
> > other reasons, but this is the one relevant to this discussion.
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't see such a feature in Thunderbird
> under Win32 either.  In order to reply to the list, I must reply to all,
> cut the mailing list address from the CC field and replace the personal
> senders' e-mail address in the TO field with it.

See, I just think you guys should stop using bad clients.  ;)  Kmail replies 
to the list (and only to the list) by default.  (Which, actually, appears to 
be a violation on the relevant standards.  :P)
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.                     ,= ,-_-. =. 
bss@iguanasuicide.net                     ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy           `-'(. .)`-' 
http://iguanasuicide.net/                      \_/     

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply to: