Re: [OT] mailing lists versus usenet / reply to list, reply-to, reply
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> See, I just think you guys should stop using bad clients. ;) Kmail replies
> to the list (and only to the list) by default. (Which, actually, appears to
> be a violation on the relevant standards. :P)
Is Kmail available for Win32? I'm at work on my laptop and don't have
the luxury of Linux all day.
I also stated in my previous post that the reply-to field was missing
from the SMTP header. I can manually add it from my MUA (as I did with
this mailing) but must I need to for each and every message I reply to
on this mailing list? Is it the MUA that's broken?... or the mailing list?
- Ken
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [OT] mailing lists versus usenet / reply to list, reply-to, reply
- From: "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." <bss@iguanasuicide.net>
- Re: [OT] mailing lists versus usenet / reply to list, reply-to, reply
- From: Celejar <celejar@gmail.com>
- Re: [OT] mailing lists versus usenet / reply to list, reply-to, reply
- From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Re: [OT] mailing lists versus usenet / reply to list, reply-to, reply
- From: Steve Lamb <grey@dmiyu.org>
- Re: [OT] mailing lists versus usenet / reply to list, reply-to, reply
- From: Micha Feigin <michf@post.tau.ac.il>
- Re: [OT] mailing lists versus usenet / reply to list, reply-to, reply
- From: Andrei Popescu <andreimpopescu@gmail.com>