Nelson Castillo wrote: >> No, don't. I'm just wondering why. Actually I did a test in the same order >> (bzip2 and the pbzip2) on a tar of my picture directory and on a video. I >> just don't understand why my 2 runs aren't much quicker with pbzip2. > > Your test data is already compressed :-) You will not be able to > compress it much more. But is this really reason to take twice CPU time with no significant reduce of time? Though maybe it's just peculiarity of pbzip2 implementation. -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com Ukrainian C++ Developer, Debian Maintainer, APT contributor
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature