Re: Lenny/Violatile is Stable?

[Arthur Marsh <arthur.marsh@internode.on.net>]

Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote, on 03/12/08 18:43:
> On Saturday 2008 November 29 00:38, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > My line for the debian-volatile repository for lenny is:
> > deb     http://localhost:9999/volatile  lenny/volatile
> > Of course, this goes to my local approx which is configured like:
> > volatile        http://volatile.debian.org/debian-volatile
> >
> > Anyway, the Release file I've downloaded looks something like:
> > Origin: volatile.debian.org
> > Label: debian-volatile
> > Suite: stable
> > Codename: lenny
> > Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 03:36:18 UTC
> > Architectures: amd64 alpha arm armel hppa i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc
> > s390 sparc
> > Components: volatile/main volatile/contrib volatile/non-free
> > Description: volatile.debian.org
> >
> > Why exactly is the suite stable?
>
> I'm fairly convinced this is a bug.  How do I file a bug report against 
> debian-volatile?  I think the Debian BTS needs a package name to accept the 
> bug, and I'm wondering what to use.  Is there a pseudo-package for 
> infrastructure?  If so, would this bug be appropriate for that?

If you search http://www.debian.org/Bugs/ for the text:

"The current list of pseudo-packages recognized by the Debian bug 
tracking system."

you will find a link to http://www.debian.org/Bugs/pseudo-packages which 
may be able to help you.

Arthur.