On Monday 17 November 2008, "Patrick Wiseman" <pwiseman@gmail.com> wrote about 'Re: Q: List Policy': >I used to be rabid about plain text emails I'm not a rabid as I used to be; I'll even open the HTML from time to time. >Are there >clients sending emails which don't offer the alternative content >(plain or html)? I know gmail sends both, and I think it does so in a >standards-compliant way. Some people are still on some form of metered Internet access and would prefer no to have to pay to receive the same data twice, especially since the HTML is generally significantly larger and less useful. Plus, even if the list policy is outdated, it is still *list policy* and should be followed until changed. -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. bss03@volumehost.net ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.org/ \_/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.