[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: cannot install all updates



Thierry Chatelet wrote: 

> On Thursday 23 October 2008 08:25:04 JoeHill wrote:
> > Ron Johnson wrote:  
> > > On 10/22/08 23:34, JoeHill wrote:  
> > > > JoeHill wrote:  
> > > >> Question is, is there some way to find out more info on what packages
> > > >> are preventing HAL from being installed? Or _is_ that the question...?
> > > >> Not sure.  
> > > >
> > > > ...forgot to mention, I did run the 'smart upgrade', but I did not see
> > > > what the 'proposed removals' were, which is why I'm concerned.  
> > >
> > > This is why I never use synaptics, but stick with apt-get, the tool
> > > that God Intended Us To Use.
> > >
> > > Besides, it will explicitly tell you what the problem packages are.  
> >
> > node1:/home/joehill# apt-get upgrade
> > Reading package lists... Done
> > Building dependency tree
> > Reading state information... Done
> > The following packages have been kept back:
> >   hal
> > The following packages will be upgraded:
> >   djvulibre-desktop libapr1 libaudio-dev libaudio2 libdjvulibre21
> >   libenchant1c2a libhal-dev libhal-storage1 libhal1 libmono-cairo1.0-cil
> >   libmono-corlib1.0-cil libmono-corlib2.0-cil libmono-data-tds1.0-cil
> >   libmono-data-tds2.0-cil libmono-i18n1.0-cil libmono-i18n2.0-cil
> >   libmono-security1.0-cil libmono-security2.0-cil libmono-sharpzip0.84-cil
> >   libmono-sharpzip2.84-cil libmono-sqlite2.0-cil libmono-system-data1.0-cil
> >   libmono-system-data2.0-cil libmono-system-web1.0-cil
> >   libmono-system-web2.0-cil libmono-system1.0-cil libmono-system2.0-cil
> >   libmono0 libmono1.0-cil libmono2.0-cil libpci3 libperl5.10 libpq5
> >   mono-common mono-gac mono-jit mono-runtime pciutils perl perl-base
> > perl-doc perl-modules screenlets tzdata
> > 44 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
> >
> > I'll accept that you're right about apt-get in general, but it's still not
> > telling me why hal is being held back.
> >
> > I didn't see anything in the manpage to give me more verbose information.
> > I'm not saying it's not there, just that I didn't see it ;)
> >
> > --
> > Joe  
> 
> I dont want to start a church war, but try try aptitude why-not <package>

Bless you ;)

Anyhow, I tried that with hal, and it just told me that hal did not have to be
removed.

-- 
Joe


Reply to: