Ron Johnson wrote:
There is a measure of logic there. Having both is in line with the philosophy of "do one thing, do it well". There are a number of uses for diff where folding back into the original is not a part of the deal—thus, no patch.On 09/10/08 18:28, gary turner wrote:Ron Johnson wrote:On 09/10/08 16:03, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:<snip>The main purpose of diff is to generate a patch which can then be used toapply/revert changes across two versions of a file.That would sanely be called "patch", not "diff".See man patch. diff consists of differences between files, and patch folds those differences back into the original.Then that should be: $ patch --gen-diff $ patch --apply-diff
cheers, gary -- Anyone can make a usable web site. It takes a graphic designer to make it slow, confusing and painful to use.
begin:vcard fn:Gary Turner n:Turner;Gary org:Gary Turner, Web Developer adr:;;;;;;USA email;internet:gary.kk5st@gmail.com title:Czar x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://gtwebdev.com/ version:2.1 end:vcard