On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 09:25:39PM -0700, NewDeb wrote: > > Here is the output with apt-get install (albeit with --download-only. You get > the same output if you were to go ahead with the real install) I am trying > to understand the difference between the NEW packages and the Extra > packages. Why are they being called out separately ? Even if some packages > are "Extra", are they newly installed too ? > so, overall, how is it running apt on fedora? Is this a new experience for you or have you been doing it for a while? Is it a superior experience to rpm/yum/whatever? A > > apt-get --download-only install tomcat5 > Reading Package Lists... Done > Building Dependency Tree... Done > The following extra packages will be installed: > axis (1.2.1-2jpp.7.fc7) > bcel (5.1-10jpp.4.fc7) > classpathx-jaf (1.0-9jpp.1) > classpathx-mail (1.1.1-4jpp.3) > eclipse-ecj (3.2.2-15.fc7) > gcc-java (4.1.2-27.fc7) > jakarta-commons-beanutils (1.7.0-5jpp.1) > jakarta-commons-collections (3.1-9jpp.2.fc7.1) > jakarta-commons-collections-tomcat5 (3.1-9jpp.2.fc7.1) > jakarta-commons-daemon (1.0.1-6jpp.2.fc7) > jakarta-commons-dbcp-tomcat5 (1.2.1-10jpp.1.fc7) > jakarta-commons-digester (1.7-6jpp.1) > jakarta-commons-discovery (0.3-4jpp.1) > jakarta-commons-el (1.0-7jpp.1.fc7) > jakarta-commons-httpclient (3.0.1-1jpp.1.fc7) > jakarta-commons-launcher (1.1-1jpp.2.fc7) > jakarta-commons-logging (1.0.4-6jpp.1) > jakarta-commons-modeler (2.0-3jpp.1.fc7) > jakarta-commons-pool-tomcat5 (1.3-9jpp.2.fc7.1) > java-1.5.0-gcj (1.5.0.0-14.fc7) > java-1.5.0-gcj-devel (1.5.0.0-14.fc7) > java_cup (0.10-0.k.6jpp.1) > jdom (1.0-4jpp.1) > jpackage-utils (1.7.3-1jpp.3.fc7) > libgcj-devel (4.1.2-27.fc7) > libgcj-src (4.1.2-27.fc7) > log4j (1.2.13-3jpp.2) > mx4j (3.0.1-6jpp.4) > regexp (1.4-3jpp.1.fc7) > saxon (6.5.5-1jpp.2.fc7) > sinjdoc (0.5-4.fc7) > tomcat5-common-lib (5.5.26-1jpp.2.fc7) > tomcat5-jasper (5.5.26-1jpp.2.fc7) > tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api (5.5.26-1jpp.2.fc7) > tomcat5-server-lib (5.5.26-1jpp.2.fc7) > tomcat5-servlet-2.4-api (5.5.26-1jpp.2.fc7) > wsdl4j (1.5.2-4jpp.1) > xalan-j2 (2.7.0-6jpp.1) > xerces-j2 (2.7.1-7jpp.2) > xml-commons-apis (1.3.03-0jpp.1.fc7) > xml-commons-resolver (1.1-1jpp.12) > The following NEW packages will be installed: > axis (1.2.1-2jpp.7.fc7) > bcel (5.1-10jpp.4.fc7) > classpathx-jaf (1.0-9jpp.1) > classpathx-mail (1.1.1-4jpp.3) > eclipse-ecj (3.2.2-15.fc7) > gcc-java (4.1.2-27.fc7) > jakarta-commons-beanutils (1.7.0-5jpp.1) > jakarta-commons-collections (3.1-9jpp.2.fc7.1) > jakarta-commons-collections-tomcat5 (3.1-9jpp.2.fc7.1) > jakarta-commons-daemon (1.0.1-6jpp.2.fc7) > jakarta-commons-dbcp-tomcat5 (1.2.1-10jpp.1.fc7) > jakarta-commons-digester (1.7-6jpp.1) > jakarta-commons-discovery (0.3-4jpp.1) > jakarta-commons-el (1.0-7jpp.1.fc7) > jakarta-commons-httpclient (3.0.1-1jpp.1.fc7) > jakarta-commons-launcher (1.1-1jpp.2.fc7) > jakarta-commons-logging (1.0.4-6jpp.1) > jakarta-commons-modeler (2.0-3jpp.1.fc7) > jakarta-commons-pool-tomcat5 (1.3-9jpp.2.fc7.1) > java-1.5.0-gcj (1.5.0.0-14.fc7) > java-1.5.0-gcj-devel (1.5.0.0-14.fc7) > java_cup (0.10-0.k.6jpp.1) > jdom (1.0-4jpp.1) > jpackage-utils (1.7.3-1jpp.3.fc7) > libgcj-devel (4.1.2-27.fc7) > libgcj-src (4.1.2-27.fc7) > log4j (1.2.13-3jpp.2) > mx4j (3.0.1-6jpp.4) > regexp (1.4-3jpp.1.fc7) > saxon (6.5.5-1jpp.2.fc7) > sinjdoc (0.5-4.fc7) > tomcat5 (5.5.26-1jpp.2.fc7) > tomcat5-common-lib (5.5.26-1jpp.2.fc7) > tomcat5-jasper (5.5.26-1jpp.2.fc7) > tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api (5.5.26-1jpp.2.fc7) > tomcat5-server-lib (5.5.26-1jpp.2.fc7) > tomcat5-servlet-2.4-api (5.5.26-1jpp.2.fc7) > wsdl4j (1.5.2-4jpp.1) > xalan-j2 (2.7.0-6jpp.1) > xerces-j2 (2.7.1-7jpp.2) > xml-commons-apis (1.3.03-0jpp.1.fc7) > xml-commons-resolver (1.1-1jpp.12) > 0 upgraded, 42 newly installed, 0 removed and 27 not upgraded. > > Thanks, > > > Daniel Burrows wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 12:27:23PM -0700, NewDeb <ace_shikha@hotmail.com> > > was heard to say: > >> I am a Debian newbie and was wondering what is the difference between the > >> NEW and Extra packages that are installed when dpkg -i is used. > > > > I don't recognize those offhand as dpkg output. Could you paste a > > snippet what you're referring to? (i.e., install something with "dpkg -i" > > and paste the output here) > > > > Thanks, > > Daniel > > > > > > -- > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > > listmaster@lists.debian.org > > > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/difference-between-NEW-and-Extra-packages-in-dpkg-install-tp18950973p18956802.html > Sent from the Debian User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org > > --
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature