[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Help filing bug report; can't use automated tool, does this report look OK?

Arthur A <arthur.machlas@gmail.com>:
>  Celejar wrote:
> > [snip]
> > I have reported a version of this to upstream (as per a request by one of the DDs in a similar bug log:
> > 
> > http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16262
> > 
> > See also:
> > 
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=465694
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=432110
> [snip]
>  Since then I've removed that line from xorg.conf and removed the libflash.so 
>  plugin (I'd be using 10 beta). I've installed gnash, but really, I'm just doing 
>  without flash. I've no reason to suspect flash is at fault, it's just something 

Really?  You don't consider flash a horribly buggy, poorly implemented
disaster?  Huh.  "This Shockwave Flash file type is known to ..."

Finding it to actually work is a surprise, here.  Usually it's kill
-HUP $(pidof swf), and I get my browser back.

Admittedly, this is etch.

Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(*)    http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html      Linux Counter #80292
- -    http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html    Please, don't Cc: me.

Reply to: