Re: Firefox (Iceweasel) 3: is this page rendered horribly?

[Carl Fink <carlf@panix.com>]

On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 06:07:41PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:25:35 -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
> > OK, if the page looks fine to everyone else, why would it be wrong in both
> > Epiphany and Iceweasel on my box?
> 
> Epiphany is also based on the Gecko rendering engine, isn't it?
> 
> If you use an Intel integrated graphics card with  XAA acceleration, try
> the XAANoOffscreenPixmaps workaround (see bug #482992).
> 
> > Could it be that I've been reluctant to restart X (up for 74 days) despite
> > installing several upgrades?
> 
> To find out which services/processes need restarting after an upgrade,
> run
> 
> lsof | grep "path inode"
> 
> as root. This should list all processes that hang on to stale files. The
> checkrestart command from "debian-goodies" is supposed to do the same
> thing more comfortably, but this does not work for me at the moment (see
> bug #491235).

There were lots, and restarting X didn't free them.  A restart fixed the
problem.

Thanks. 
-- 
Carl Fink                           nitpicking@nitpicking.com 

Read my blog at blog.nitpicking.com.  Reviews!  Observations!
Stupid mistakes you can correct!