On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:17:55AM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 05:35:55PM -0400, Damon L. Chesser wrote: > > On Monday 14 July 2008 05:26:14 pm Alex Samad wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 02:59:00PM -0400, Damon L. Chesser wrote: > > > > On Monday 14 July 2008 02:47:06 pm Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 08:02:05AM +1000, Alex Samad wrote: > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > > > > > I have noticed that openjdk has made it into the repo's. Wondering > > > > > > what people thoughts where on > > > > > > > > > > > > openjdk, gij and gcj ? > ... > > > > > > > I haven't used openjdk and I used gcj a while back (its installed but I > > > default to the sun implementation) there is also the ibm version and > > > bea's versions > > with sun-java fully open now, it will be interesting to watch what > happens. Will gcj continue, pulling code from sun-java, or will the > gcj people accept sun-java and allow gcj to just die. > > A I think you are mixing up gij and java - both virtual machines. gcj takes java and produces executables - compiles to native code. -- "Your stupidity, Allen, is simply not up to par." -- Dave Mack (mack@inco.UUCP) "Yours is." -- Allen Gwinn (allen@sulaco.sigma.com), in alt.flame
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature