On Tuesday 15 July 2008 02:17:55 pm Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 05:35:55PM -0400, Damon L. Chesser wrote: > > On Monday 14 July 2008 05:26:14 pm Alex Samad wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 02:59:00PM -0400, Damon L. Chesser wrote: > > > > On Monday 14 July 2008 02:47:06 pm Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 08:02:05AM +1000, Alex Samad wrote: > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > > > > > I have noticed that openjdk has made it into the repo's. > > > > > > Wondering what people thoughts where on > > > > > > > > > > > > openjdk, gij and gcj ? > > ... > > > > I haven't used openjdk and I used gcj a while back (its installed but I > > > default to the sun implementation) there is also the ibm version and > > > bea's versions > > with sun-java fully open now, it will be interesting to watch what > happens. Will gcj continue, pulling code from sun-java, or will the > gcj people accept sun-java and allow gcj to just die. > > A I have been wondering about that. And that is also the reason why I am confused by *java* in Linux. Sun-java is GPL IFAIK. -- Damon L. Chesser damon@damtek.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/dchesser
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.