[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: CUPS vs lpd (was Re: Giving up on Iceweasel 3.0)



On 07 Jul 2008, Jan Willem Stumpel wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> 
> Indeed. Very strange. And I even have it installed. But ff3 can
> print to lpr only when I install the compiled-from-source version
> of 2.10 (in /usr/local). As soon as I uninstall it, lpr printing
> on ff3 becomes unavailable.
> 
> /usr/lib/gtk-2.0 (the Debian version) contains subdirectories:
>    2.10.0  2.2.0  2.4.0  include  modules
> 
> No 2.12.0! I don't understand this numbering system.
> 
> /usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0 contains: 2.10.0  2.2.0  2.4.0  include
> (no "modules", but the same version numbers).
> 
> The real difference is probably to be found here: the Sid version has:
> 
> jws@vega:~$ ls -alG /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/printbackends/
> total 104
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root  4096 2008-06-09 17:32 .
> drwxr-xr-x 9 root  4096 2007-04-15 14:58 ..
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root 52980 2008-06-07 11:16 libprintbackend-cups.so
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root 13044 2008-06-07 11:16 libprintbackend-file.so
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root 10084 2008-06-07 11:16 libprintbackend-lpr.so
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root 11140 2008-06-07 11:16 libprintbackend-test.so
> 
> While the compiled-from-source version (from gtk.org) has:
> 
> jws@vega:~$ ls -alG /usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/printbackends/
> total 92
> drwxr-sr-x 2 root  4096 2008-07-06 21:26 .
> drwxr-sr-x 6 root  4096 2008-07-06 21:26 ..
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root  1315 2008-07-06 21:26 libprintbackend-file.la
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root 37984 2008-07-06 21:26 libprintbackend-file.so
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root  1309 2008-07-06 21:26 libprintbackend-lpr.la
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root 34034 2008-07-06 21:26 libprintbackend-lpr.so
> 
> I compiled by just "./configure", "make", without setting any
> options. So by default gtk does not have a cups print backend,
> only "lpr" and "file" (when compiled on a cups-less system, I
> presume). The Debian version has "lpr" and "file", as well as
> "cups" and something called "test".
> 
> Maybe you can explain these findings. Anyway it seems that the bug
> is not in ff3 but in libgtk2.0-0.
> 


It didn't work here. I did the same thing and the appropriate stuff in
/usr/local but I still can't print. Did you do something to make FF see
the gtk-2.10 stuff?

Anthony

-- 
Anthony Campbell - ac@acampbell.org.uk 
Microsoft-free zone - Using Debian GNU/Linux
http://www.acampbell.org.uk (blog, book reviews, 
and sceptical articles)


Reply to: