Re: Re: Barry? Also berry_charge
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 02:12:20PM +0200, NN_il_Confusionario wrote:
...
> and what about
>
> find /lib/modules/ -iname \*berry\*
>
> and then
>
> insmod $THE_COMPLETE_PATH_FOUND_AS_ABOVE
>
> (if there is a module in /lib/modules/`uname -r`/ which probably is not
> true given the depmod -a result above)
/home/carlf# find /lib/modules/ -iname \*berry\*
/lib/modules/2.6.22-2-k7/kernel/drivers/usb/misc/berry_charge.ko
/lib/modules/2.6.22-3-k7/kernel/drivers/usb/misc/berry_charge.ko
/home/carlf# modprobe /lib/modules/2.6.22-3-k7/kernel/drivers/usb/misc/berry_charge.ko
FATAL: Module /lib/modules/2.6.22_3_k7/kernel/drivers/usb/misc/berry_charge.ko not found.
So, is refusing to admit that a file which is clearly present in fact exists
a bug in the kernel worth reporting?
I may just go ahead and compile a custom kernl with berry_charge integral.
--
Carl Fink nitpicking@nitpicking.com
Read my blog at blog.nitpicking.com. Reviews! Observations!
Stupid mistakes you can correct!
Reply to: