Re: browsers have become memory hogs

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: browsers have become memory hogs
From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:43:11 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 47FE97FF.2000703@cox.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200804101507.17941.kloro2006@gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 200804101235.30646.kloro2006@gmail.com> <[🔎] 200804102237.10399.tchatelet@free.fr> <[🔎] 47FE831E.6020803@dsl.pipex.com> <[🔎] 200804101507.17941.kloro2006@gmail.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 04/10/08 17:07, tom arnall wrote:
[snip]
> 
> and what does CPU% look like?

I know you asked this of Andy, but really the answer depends on the
web site.  Dynamic sites that love Flash and thousands of animated
GIFs will use more CPU than calmer sites.

- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA  USA

We want... a Shrubbery!!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFH/pf+S9HxQb37XmcRAgyTAJ479QDBFvx4I+aJ+VQivd73/JkYDQCfWSNC
uNbuqr4JeUhQy9jrB6uAxy8=
=VJvw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: browsers have become memory hogs
  - From: Hugo Vanwoerkom <hvw59601@care2.com>

References:
- browsers have become memory hogs
  - From: tom arnall <kloro2006@gmail.com>
- Re: browsers have become memory hogs
  - From: Thierry Chatelet <tchatelet@free.fr>
- Re: browsers have become memory hogs
  - From: andy <geek_show@dsl.pipex.com>
- Re: browsers have become memory hogs
  - From: tom arnall <kloro2006@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: SSH connections stall expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REPLY
Next by Date: Re: system not using hosts file
Previous by thread: Re: browsers have become memory hogs
Next by thread: Re: browsers have become memory hogs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread