Re: --OMG_OPTIMIZED
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 04/04/08 14:46, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Fri, April 4, 2008 11:57 am, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> Is there a problem with that? (I must not be understanding your
>> point...)
>
> Nope. The message I was responding to had responded to Paul stating
> that there is a 1-2% increase, measurable by the tools cited, if one
> compiled all programs and libraries for the specific architecture they
> will be running on. This was after Paul pointed out that selected
> applications are already compiled for targeted platforms if they get a
> significant speed boost but that a total targeted compile for all of
> Debian would be a waste of DD time and mirror space for the negligible
> increase.
>
> My point was that the 1-2% measurable increase from compiling the rest
> of programs and libraries that are not currently targeted compiled would
> probably be measured in idle time since most programs and most libraries
> are doing just that these days. Just because 1-2% can be measured from
> an overall targeted compile does not mean it is meaningful in real world
> cases.
Oh, ok. Then I totally agree with you.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
We want... a Shrubbery!!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFH9otjS9HxQb37XmcRAmPXAJwNySWjzhzvs1exvuG3fA96Zw5oxgCgpmjp
E5T1ywLDKHbRrPIbptkn0L4=
=a9VV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: