Re: RAID suggestions?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 03/19/08 07:03, Alex Samad wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 05:41:20PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 03/18/08 17:21, Gregory Seidman wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 04:33:19PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>>>>> On 03/18/08 16:03, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
>>>>>> Ron Johnson wrote:
>>>>>>> On 03/18/08 15:41, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
>>>>>>> [snip]
>> [snip]
> We (well, the company I work for) has much higher bandwidth needs
> than that. Which is why all new purchases now use SANs. RAID 10
> and a lot of cache makes a database really scream. Then it's only
> the FC switch that's the potential bottleneck...
>> Q) have you investigated 10G over FC ?
You mean 10Gb FC switches? No.
Extra 4Gb ports and HBAs give us the bandwidth we need.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFH4RHdS9HxQb37XmcRAowoAJ9Ynp02LRNLPPmeiGB1EjbtLJeamwCePaU6
5FPUgQWLFypZUaiXwuJtjKQ=
=Hx4W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: