Re: [OT] spamassassin overreach?
On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 16:37:41 -0700
Daniel Burrows <dburrows@debian.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Did anyone else notice that spamassassin buried this message
> > > for the mere mention of the site "mail-to-web.com"? (that's
> > > not the string that was used, but I don't want to fall into a
> > > spambucket)
> >
> > Nope. Here's how SA scored it for me:
> >
> > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on
> > haggis.homelan
> > X-Spam-Level:
> > X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=4.2
> > tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.3
>
> Interesting. I unfortunately deleted the mail (d'oh), but I
> had a half-dozen lines telling me that mail2web.com was on all sorts
> of blacklists.
>
> Daniel
Everything was okay here.
--
Raquel
============================================================
He that blows the coals in quarrels he has nothing to do with, has no
right to complain if the sparks fly in his face.
--Benjamin Franklin
Reply to: