Flash removed from etch - process explained?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
From a recent message on this list I saw a link to the 4.0r3 etch
release
http://lists.debian.org/debian-announce/2008/msg00000.html
Going to that link I see that they have removed flash
Closed source and no security support
It also says
The complete list of all accepted and rejected packages together with
rationale is on the preparation page for this revision:
<http://release.debian.org/stable/4.0/4.0r3/>
Going on to that page - there is no mention of flash at all.
What is the normal Debian procedure here? How can I find out who/how
this decision was made and why?
Please note I am expressing no opinion or trolling. I'm just trying
to get more insight into the Debian 'psyche'
Your comments appreciated
Brian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
Comment: Verify this email or encrypt your email for free - see gnupg.org
iD8DBQFHxZrhGnOmb9xIQHQRAmEsAKCnKBLEOPNR29CQgAQe06Deikt9BQCeNwn2
oNmQYOEIMcDsxmVPFY0It/Q=
=MGWX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: