On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:56:44 -0600 Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> wrote: Hello Nate, > This morning it hit me that he was refering to the development > security of FF which he alleged makes it inferior to IE with its OEM > control. A common enough argument, but totally wrong. With FLOSS, one can see what's happening, as the code is available. Closed source, and you're shafted, since anyone can write into the software some really nasty stuff, and you'd never know. Alternatively, you can argue that closed source is totally secure development. Not for the end user though, as *only* the provider knows what it does. -- Regards _ / ) "The blindingly obvious is / _)rad never immediately apparent" I am alone there's nobody there I Look Alone - Buzzcocks
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature