Re: mail vs. Mutt
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 8:58 AM, Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/15/08 10:47, Andrius wrote:
>
> > Ron Johnson wrote:
> >> On 02/15/08 10:07, Andrius wrote:
> >>> Returning to the question about Mutt.
> >>> Why to complicate a life when all mailing tasks perfectly can do simple
> >>> command 'Mail'?
> >>
> >> What the hell does that mean?
> >
>
> > That is reflections about what is best way to send and receive mail.
>
> You're a n00b. Stop philosophizing and just start using a standard
> GUI mail client that fits well with your desktop. KMail for KDE;
> Icedove or Evolution for GNOME.
I fail to see why not using "a standard GUI mail client" is n00bish.
Advocating ever more basic systems for reading mail may be silly,
(or may not be) but a n00b is unlikely to even know about mutt and
mail.
Cheers,
Kelly Clowers
Reply to: