[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Release: KNOPPIX5.1.1 for Trusted Compuintg Geeks (v1.0)



On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 10:52:47AM +0900, Kuniyasu Suzaki wrote:
> 
>  >>From: Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir@cohens.org.il>
>  >>Subject: Re: Release: KNOPPIX5.1.1 for Trusted Compuintg Geeks (v1.0)
>  >>
>  >>On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 07:31:11AM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>  >>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 11:32:51AM +0000, steef wrote:
>  >>> > Kuniyasu Suzaki wrote:
>  >>> >> Dear,
>  >>> >>
>  >>> >> We released KNOPPIX5.1.1 for Trusted Computing Geeks (v1.0).
>  >>> >>    http://unit.aist.go.jp/itri/knoppix/index-en.html
>  >>> >> It includes trusted computing software based on TPM(Trusted Platform
>  >>> >> Module). Debian packages on KNOPPIX is validated by Remote Attestation.
>  >>> -------------------------------------------------------^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>  >>> 
>  >>> sounds an awful lot like Remote Exploit to me.
>  >>
>  >>That's indeed remotely similar.
> 
> Our remote attestation is a kind of CHECKER of two type of database
> for trustworthy. The database of DSA (Debian Security Advisory)
> validates the packages of knoppix.  The database of platform integrity
> was created by our samples, which is listed at
>   http://sourceforge.jp/projects/openpts/wiki/PlatformInfo
> The database validates the boot procedure, which is based on "Trusted
> Computing".

Sorry, I just don't get it.

Given that the platform includes gcc, perl and python (and wget), what
practical use is there in in the guarantees you can achive?

What happens if I just innstall something from source?

Recall that for the Xbox it only took one buggy game to allow installing
an arbitrary software (e.g.: Linux) by the user.

-- 
Tzafrir Cohen         | tzafrir@jabber.org | VIM is
http://tzafrir.org.il |                    | a Mutt's
tzafrir@cohens.org.il |                    |  best
ICQ# 16849754         |                    | friend


Reply to: