[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: packages broken



I had a corrupt .desktop file in /usr/share/applications, removing it
and running update-desktop-database fixed the problem and I was able
to finish installing the limbo packages. A developer has fixed the
problem in desktop-file-utils and a patch is ready , per the forwarded
message below, for the Debian package maintainer to apply.

Zach


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: gnome-desktop (bugzilla.gnome.org) <bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.gnome.org>
Date: Jan 20, 2008 2:34 PM
Subject: [Bug 509526] update-desktop-database crashed on corrupt .desktop files
To: netrek@gmail.com


If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at
the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text
at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at:
  http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=509526

  gnome-desktop | general | Ver: 2.14.x

Vincent Untz changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |vuntz@gnome.org
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




------- Comment #1 from Vincent Untz  2008-01-20 19:34 UTC -------
Thanks, I've fixed this in desktop-file-utils. You can get a patch here for
debian if you want:
http://webcvs.freedesktop.org/menus/desktop-file-utils/src/update-desktop-database.c?r1=1.8&r2=1.9

(also, note that bugs of desktop-file-utils are tracked in freedesktop.org
bugzilla)



--
See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info
about why you received
this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving
emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone
if you are having problems with the system.

You can add comments to this bug at
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=509526.


Reply to: