On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 07:36:58AM -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote: > On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 03:44:00PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.org> was heard to say: > > On 2007-12-20 07:55:21 -0600, Kent West wrote: > > > Is not "screen" another solution? (I'm not terribly familiar with > > > "screen", but I thought this sort of > > > backgrounding-and-come-back-to-it-later thing was something it does.) > > > > Yes, of course... unless one doesn't want to leave another process > > on the machine. > > IIRC if you do "screen <command>", screen will exit as soon as the > command does. yes. It's darned annoying when you accidently close the last "window"... A
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature