Re: Gnome Update Manager's "Smart" Update
- To: "Andrew J. Barr" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Cc: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: Gnome Update Manager's "Smart" Update
- From: Tyler MacDonald <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 09:36:58 -0700
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20071001163657.GH12102@yi.org>
- In-reply-to: <email@example.com>
- References: <20070915182325.GA29075@yi.org> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20070915212408.GB29075@yi.org> <email@example.com>
Andrew J. Barr <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > > "smart" refers to resolving dependencies by installing additional
> > > packages or removing software, as opposed to simply not installing
> > > packages that would require such actions.
> > Is that always the smart thing to do?
> That's why you have the option to turn it down.
Right. So could we, say, call it "Stupid update" instead? Or "Destructive