Re: binary packages versus source

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: binary packages versus source
From: mockingbird@earthlight.co.nz (Chris Bannister)
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 18:37:06 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 20070928223706.GE513@box>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 46F76E15.5010306@gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 46F75812.2050900@gmail.com> <[🔎] 20070924004032.49f6d671.atu13439@csun.edu> <[🔎] 46F76E15.5010306@gmail.com>

On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 09:58:13AM +0200, pietia wrote:
> so , why the developers doesn't recompile their packages ? Or why there 
> are no
> packages in two version (compiled using gcc 3 and 4 )?
> 
> Sorry  for my questions - if sounds stupid.

Time to start reading about Debian.
Start at:

http://www.debian.org/devel/

-- 
Chris.
======

Reply to:

References:
- binary packages versus source
  - From: pietia <pietia.moo@gmail.com>
- Re: binary packages versus source
  - From: Amit Uttamchandani <atu13439@csun.edu>
- Re: binary packages versus source
  - From: pietia <pietia.moo@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: How to reduce pdf file size with open source software?
Next by Date: Re: can pbzip2 run on stdout?
Previous by thread: Re: binary packages versus source
Next by thread: Re: binary packages versus source
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread