[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: amd64 vs i386



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 09/15/07 06:03, Martin Marcher wrote:
> 2007/9/15, Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 09/15/07 03:57, pietia wrote:
>>> hi
>>>
>>> Do you have any experiences in that competition: Debian amd64 vs Debian
>>> i386 ?
>>>
>>> Is i386 still faster than amd64 ?
>> Since when was i386 *ever* faster than AMD64?
> 
> since when was 64bit *ever* faster than 32bit? (speaking of speed here
> not the actual pro of having more address space)

That's not what I asked, and is not what OP asked.

Anyway, the extra 8 registers that long mode offers definitely lets
the compiler create more efficient code.  How that contrasts against
larger pointers reducing cache efficiency and bandwidth
effectiveness is app specific.

- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA  USA

Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFG68juS9HxQb37XmcRAmjKAJwPjyDGXWOrA3zRAbErsfZREFFzTQCcCw6Z
C+EqVoPrs0MnJ5K/ITvOt3I=
=j4Ak
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: