Re: Need newer software that included with stable (that isn't at backports.org)

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Need newer software that included with stable (that isn't at backports.org)
From: Jonathan Kaye <jdkaye10@yahoo.es>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 19:59:29 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] f8dbq0$s1a$1@sea.gmane.org>
References: <[🔎] 9a7c669e0707271026y1d4e7c8ek991dd87f8a64d4e3@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] f8dak4$nhf$1@sea.gmane.org> <[🔎] 9a7c669e0707271046x2263de98ibac06e73ee3006d3@mail.gmail.com>

Tim Hull wrote:

> I know about that, but then you have to pull stuff like glibc etc from
> unstable...
> 
Hi Tim,
Please don't cc. to my personal addresss. I subscribe to this NG. I probably
don't understand what you're trying to do. You would only have to "pull
stuff like glibc" from unstable if (a) you were pinning to unstable rather
than, say, testing and (b) if the package you were looking to pin had that
particular version of glibc as a dependency. I guess I don't understand
what you want. Sorry.
Jonathan
-- 
Registerd Linux user #445917 at http://counter.li.org/

Reply to:

References:
- Need newer software that included with stable (that isn't at backports.org)
  - From: "Tim Hull" <thully@umich.edu>
- Re: Need newer software that included with stable (that isn't at backports.org)
  - From: Jonathan Kaye <jdkaye10@yahoo.es>
- Re: Need newer software that included with stable (that isn't at backports.org)
  - From: "Tim Hull" <thully@umich.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: why do iceweasel et al have more frequent security issues?
Next by Date: I/O schedulers tests on USB flash
Previous by thread: Re: Need newer software that included with stable (that isn't at backports.org)
Next by thread: Re: Need newer software that included with stable (that isn't at backports.org)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread