Re: why do iceweasel et al have more frequent security issues?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: why do iceweasel et al have more frequent security issues?
From: Hugo Vanwoerkom <hvw59601@care2.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:50:58 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] f8aqei$6te$1@sea.gmane.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87tzrrxgmo.fsf@toncho.dhh.gt.org>
References: <[🔎] 20070726162323.GA8760@titan> <[🔎] 87tzrrxgmo.fsf@toncho.dhh.gt.org>

John Hasler wrote:

Doug writes:
It seems that the mozilla-derived browsers have security issues requiring
updates far more frequently than other browsers like Konqueror or links2.
I'm curious as to why this is. Does anyone have any ideas?
How many people are looking for holes in Konq or Links2?

2?

Reply to:

References:
- why do iceweasel et al have more frequent security issues?
  - From: Douglas Allan Tutty <dtutty@porchlight.ca>
- Re: why do iceweasel et al have more frequent security issues?
  - From: John Hasler <jhasler@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: How to generate script with Apache and run it by root avoiding to "kill" security
Next by Date: Re: why do iceweasel et al have more frequent security issues?
Previous by thread: Re: why do iceweasel et al have more frequent security issues?
Next by thread: Re: why do iceweasel et al have more frequent security issues?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread