also sprach Andrew Sackville-West <andrew@farwestbilliards.com> [2007.07.10.1908 +0200]: > which is sort of vague. the examples further down the manpage do > not make use of level= at all to provide a reference. Yes, I saw this. > I think the two items taken together rather strongly imply that if > one uses the level= option in mdadm.conf that the 'raid' is not > required. I think it also implies that sourcing the level= option > in mdadm.conf as a way to determine the required modules for the > initramfs may not be valid, but my bash-foo is not up to snuff and > I can't really tell what hooks/mdadm does in anything more than > a general way. There may be no other good way to tell which > modules are needed and just cramming all of them in the image is > obviously a less-than-ideal solution. Good point. Could I convince you to create a bug report against mdadm so that I can address this in future uploads? Thanks, -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org> : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems in seattle, washington, it is illegal to carry a concealed weapon that is over six feet in length.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)