Re: Is Etch still stable?
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:41:28 +0100
michael <cs@networkingnewsletter.org.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 11:52 +0200, Nyizsnyik Ferenc wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 01:27:18 -0400
> > Kevin Mark <kevin.mark@verizon.net> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 10:48:07PM +0200, Nyizsnyik Ferenc wrote:
> > > > Hello folks,
> > > >
> > > > I visited http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/
> > > > It used to show 8 bugs "concerning the current stable release",
> > > > that is Etch, and some 500-600 "concerning the next release".
> > > > Now it shows 522 bugs for Etch. Am I missing something?
> > > Yes. The page does not show the word 'etch'. Etch is the current
> > > stable. Lenny is the next stable. If you look at the graph, the
> > > bottom line dips near zero at april or may, that was the release
> > > of Etch.
> >
> > Yes, that bottom line jumped up to 520 recently. Also, 520 bugs are
> > shown for the current stable release. And we agree on that is Etch,
>
> I disagree! From the above it sounds like the graph is for next
> stable, which prior to Apr/May was etch but is now lenny. It's not
> etch only
Have you folks actually visited the page? There are three lines showing
bug counts:
RED line: Total number of release-critical bugs
GREEN line: Number concerning the next release
BLUE line: Number concerning the current stable release
Red and green lines have local minimums at June 2005 (Sarge was
released) and April 2007 (Etch was released). The BLUE line (the one I
was talking about) started in April 2007 with 8 bugs. Yesterday it went
up to 522. And "Number concerning the current stable release: 522".
> > whether or not the word "Etch" is shown on the page.
> >
> > --
> > Szia:
> > Nyizsa.
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Get a free email account with anti spam protection.
> > http://www.bluebottle.com
> >
> >
>
>
--
Szia:
Nyizsa.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out how you can get spam free email.
http://www.bluebottle.com
Reply to: