Re: Is Etch still stable?
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 11:52 +0200, Nyizsnyik Ferenc wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 01:27:18 -0400
> Kevin Mark <kevin.mark@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 10:48:07PM +0200, Nyizsnyik Ferenc wrote:
> > > Hello folks,
> > >
> > > I visited http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/
> > > It used to show 8 bugs "concerning the current stable release",
> > > that is Etch, and some 500-600 "concerning the next release". Now
> > > it shows 522 bugs for Etch. Am I missing something?
> > Yes. The page does not show the word 'etch'. Etch is the current
> > stable. Lenny is the next stable. If you look at the graph, the
> > bottom line dips near zero at april or may, that was the release of
> > Etch.
>
> Yes, that bottom line jumped up to 520 recently. Also, 520 bugs are
> shown for the current stable release. And we agree on that is Etch,
I disagree! From the above it sounds like the graph is for next stable,
which prior to Apr/May was etch but is now lenny. It's not etch only
> whether or not the word "Etch" is shown on the page.
>
> --
> Szia:
> Nyizsa.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Get a free email account with anti spam protection.
> http://www.bluebottle.com
>
>
Reply to: