Re: [OT] Re: SSH versus SSHFS

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: SSH versus SSHFS
From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 20:22:41 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 464273E1.6010208@cox.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 2A7DE12F-F98B-42D0-83F7-B9CFE92BD86F@tacocat.net>
References: <3676476.8yspeGBHQL@ursa-major.ursine.ca> <200704271314.06928.juha.tuuna@utu.fi> <20070427151940.GC1702@localhost.localdomain> <463222DD.5000606@noctus.net> <463236E1.9090600@cox.net> <20070427214642.GQ24895@localhost.localdomain> <463276F1.700@cox.net> <4632DE39.5000908@hyre.net> <20070428043500.GC31200@localhost.localdomain> <4632FA00.5080504@orange.nl> <20070428213422.GQ4481@samad.com.au> <4633E2BD.6080107@cox.net> <[🔎] 2A7DE12F-F98B-42D0-83F7-B9CFE92BD86F@tacocat.net>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 05/09/07 19:51, Tom Allison wrote:
> And to think, I was actually interested in what intelligent information
> might come of this regarding SSHFS.
> I'm interested in using it.  But it seems to be something that no one
> can actually speak to.

You should have noticed that the thread was "drifting" when someone
added "[OT]" to the Subject.


- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA  USA

Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGQnPhS9HxQb37XmcRAnzGAJ0VyWhP3pKLhU0Mw4kyIvOV/t0SyQCeLt2+
eW3p5tN5RN5cW7guP4vvUpU=
=suW1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply to:

References:
- Re: [OT] Re: SSH versus SSHFS
  - From: Tom Allison <tom@tacocat.net>

Prev by Date: Re: etch help
Next by Date: Re: [ in /usr/bin Question
Previous by thread: Re: [OT] Re: SSH versus SSHFS
Next by thread: Re: [OT] Re: SSH versus SSHFS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread