On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 12:42:40PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote: > I understand Greg's comments to be about Debian's commitment to > enforcing a packaging policy, i.e. a policy on where and how things > are installed. To me is quite a different thing than a social AOL > policy. In Debian, if the install scripts of a package to not put > things where the policy says they should be _that_ is a bug in the > package. It may also be considered a bug in some other distro.s. I've > not kept track of this sort of policy issue in any other distro. since > I discovered Debian. It's not only a bug, it's a Release Critical bug. This means it is either fixed or the package will not make the stable release! How many distro's have this? Regards, Andrei -- If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature