Re: Dangers of "stable" in sources.list
Max Hyre <max@hyre.net> writes:
> So, my modest suggestion is that `stable' as a name
> should be eradicated. Roughly no downside, only closer
> adherence to the principle of least astonishment.
If you remove 'stable', then you kind of have to remove 'testing' too.
Otherwise, people who follow testing will get a blast of new software
once 'whatever' becomes stable. And how do you know which code name is
the current stable?
--
John L. Fjellstad
web: http://www.fjellstad.org/ Quis custodiet ipsos custodes
Reply to: