[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Dangers of "stable" in sources.list



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jan Sneep wrote:
[snip]
> 
> I just check my sources.list file and interestingly the default when doing a
> clean NetInst is to point to the Etch folders on the miror site, not
> "stable".
> 
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.2/785 - Release Date: 2007.05.02
> 2:16 PM
> 
> 

You just checked sources,list yet you use:

X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0)

Hmm, have to wonder.  At least you're bright enough to have a
semi-decent anti-virus program checking your mail.

As for the topic at hand, it makes no difference whether one uses
"stable" or "etch" until that is, Lenny goes stable.

Of course, people who had Sarge and used the word "stable" would now
have Etch, and without doing apt-get (or aptitude) dist-upgrade, could
find their systems in a mess.  A dist-upgrade should sort out most problems.

Joe

Joe

- --
Registerd Linux user #443289 at http://counter.li.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGOhx0iXBCVWpc5J4RAoDsAKCInW1RRNuY/ITvPBw8hrKUaJxi2ACfa0ro
yk93//y/n2quvletx4QOZcw=
=D9UN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: