On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 04:57:26PM -0400, P Kapat wrote: > On 5/2/07, Michelle Konzack <linux4michelle@freenet.de> wrote: > >Do you get a broken thread now because > >I have added stuff to the subject? > > Interesting.. This time, inspite of a changed subject line, the thread > did not break in gmail. > So what is driving the threading? There were a few "References" > headers and a "In-Rpely-To" header.... Any clue? > > >Here it is always working file. > >Mybe you should use a better MUA? > > I use gmail and kmail. What better MUA do you suggest? I guess someone > had confirmed that the thread was broken even in mutt.. From your tests (and my experience) it seems it will be ok as long as you use gmail only as smtp server with a decent local MUA (like kmail seems to be). But if you use gmail's interface it will remove relevant headers and this will break threading on a changed subject (most clients can do pseudo-threading by subject). Regards, Andrei -- If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature