On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 05:55:45PM +0100, somethin2cool wrote: > My understanding of attitudes toward Captive is that it follows the > lines of "we hate it because it just wraps a microsoft driver and is > thus evil. it should have been written from scratch". Something which I > am not concerned about. And logically speaking, this idea ought to be > the most reliable. AFAIK samba is more reliable then MS's implementation. I wonder why is that :) Regards, Andrei -- If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature