Re: update problem
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Greg Folkert wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 11:00 +0200, Ivan Glushkov wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I know that the issue is discussed already, but as of today I get:
>>
>> 10:51 ~ $ apt-get update
>> .
>> .
>> .
>> W: GPG error: http://ftp2.de.debian.org unstable Release: The following
>> signatures were invalid: BADSIG A70DAF536070D3A1 Debian Archive
>> Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch) <ftpmaster@debian.org>
>> W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
>>
>> 10:51 ~ $ gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys A70DAF536070D3A1
>> gpg: requesting key 6070D3A1 from hkp server pgp.mit.edu
>> gpg: key 6070D3A1: "Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch)
>> <ftpmaster@debian.org>" not changed
>> gpg: Total number processed: 1
>> gpg: unchanged: 1
>>
>> 10:54 ~ $ gpg --armor --export A70DAF536070D3A1 | apt-key add -
>> OK
>> 10:56 ~ $ apt-get update
>> .
>> .
>> .
>> W: GPG error: http://ftp2.de.debian.org unstable Release: The following
>> signatures were invalid: BADSIG A70DAF536070D3A1 Debian Archive
>> Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch) <ftpmaster@debian.org>
>> W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
>>
>> 10:56 ~ $ apt-key update
>> gpg: key 2D230C5F: "Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (2006)
>> <ftpmaster@debian.org>" not changed
>> gpg: key 6070D3A1: "Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch)
>> <ftpmaster@debian.org>" not changed
>> gpg: key ADB11277: "Etch Stable Release Key
>> <debian-release@lists.debian.org>" not changed
>> gpg: Total number processed: 3
>> gpg: unchanged: 3
>>
>>
>> The key looks ok to me, but the gpg still complies...
>
> apt-get install debian-archive-keyring
>
> That should fix your issue.
I had this package installed already
Cheers,
Ivan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGIzycoPV3uf0E1nsRAl/UAKCW+kiWuj10D2/7fN+ieI/E5SfQAACfdBKh
Xwdg7cjNpjBYqO9+DhPCd0Y=
=JTzr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: