Re: OT: sponge burning!
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: OT: sponge burning!
- From: Arnt Karlsen <email@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 18:08:51 +0000 (UTC)
- Message-id: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <20070330022259.GB17704@miami.connexer.com> <20070330032821.GB4883@laphapless> <460D15BF.firstname.lastname@example.org> <20070330161037.GA4981@laphapless> <460D5BA9.email@example.com> <20070330191234.GA15524@santiago.connexer.com>
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:12:34 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote in
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 01:49:13PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> On 03/30/07 11:10, dave wrote:
>> > on Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 08:50:55AM -0500 Ron Johnson wrote:
>> >> So you shoot the possibly-wounded Iraqi?
>> > If he's in the way, and others are shooting at you.
..legal, if he is serving either as a combattant or covering combattants.
It is a war crime for combattants to hide behind wounded, POW, civilians
or any other left hors de combat.
>> I can already hear Arnt's squeal of righteous indignation starting to
> Wow. That gave me a really good laugh.
..me too. ;o)
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.