Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 03/30/07 16:50, Seth Goodman wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote on Friday, March 30, 2007 4:42 PM -0500:
>
>> On 03/30/07 16:33, Seth Goodman wrote:
>>> That's a large enough hurdle that I think it safe to say the horse
>>> has left the barn on this one a long time ago. Continuing to insist
>>> that things _should_ have been different, long past the point where
>>> that is feasible, only makes us look foolish. In that, we have been
>>> successful.
>> By very similar reasoning, we should all dump Linux and go with the
>> OS that has 95% usage.
>
> Not at all. Unix predated Windows and has had a large following all
> along. This is different from the preferred usage of mailing list
> trace headers, which only a small number of implementations ever took
> seriously.
And the counter argument would be that not-munging-Reply-To has
always been popular amongst people who know what they are doing.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGDZQdS9HxQb37XmcRAslyAJ9EGTLGWZT72wgsjDycx1/zIQLFZgCePpn+
urpQsQvPQKc2ReYjtUnl5Us=
=SyQg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: