Re: "I do consider Ubuntu to be Debian" , Ian Murdock
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 07:06:03PM -0400, Michael Pobega wrote:
>
> In other words: Reviewers compare Debian stable against Ubuntu's beta
> releases, which is an unfair comparison.
>
That sort of thing often makes me think that the reviewers have some
sort of axe to grind against Debian.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: "I do consider Ubuntu to be Debian" , Ian Murdock
- From: Nik <nik@cheddarcheese.de>
- Re: "I do consider Ubuntu to be Debian" , Ian Murdock
- From: Michael Pobega <pobega@gmail.com>
- Re: "I do consider Ubuntu to be Debian" , Ian Murdock
- From: "Michael M." <mcubed@slashmail.org>
- Re: "I do consider Ubuntu to be Debian" , Ian Murdock
- From: mockingbird@earthlight.co.nz (Chris Bannister)
- Re: "I do consider Ubuntu to be Debian" , Ian Murdock
- From: "Michael M." <mcubed@slashmail.org>
- Re: "I do consider Ubuntu to be Debian" , Ian Murdock
- From: Michael Pobega <pobega@gmail.com>
- Re: "I do consider Ubuntu to be Debian" , Ian Murdock
- From: "Michael M." <mcubed@slashmail.org>
- Re: "I do consider Ubuntu to be Debian" , Ian Murdock
- From: Michael Pobega <pobega@gmail.com>
- Re: "I do consider Ubuntu to be Debian" , Ian Murdock
- From: Max Hyre <max@hyre.net>
- Re: "I do consider Ubuntu to be Debian" , Ian Murdock
- From: Michael Pobega <pobega@gmail.com>