[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Browser identification to websites



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Celejar wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:15:30 +0100
> Joe Hart <j.hart@orange.nl> wrote:
> 
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Celejar wrote:
>>> On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 09:54:29 +0100
>>> Joe Hart <j.hart@orange.nl> wrote:
>>>
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>>> Personally, I've found that some websites will block me because of my
>>>> location, and that's something I cannot change.  Unfortunately my ISP
>>>> identifies me as being here.  Perhaps I need to look into anonymizers.
>>>>
>>>> I imagine people in some other countries (China perhaps) have the same
>>>> problem with a lot more sites than I do.
>>> tor (The Onion Router).

>> That is one solution.  There are also privoxy and tsocks or a
>> combination of all three.  Ran across that info today while I was
>> searching for a solution to my problem.
> 
> Privoxy on a local system can't possibly mask your location. The tor
> people recommend using tor with privoxy to mask other things.

The site that I ran into mentions all three in combination as the best
way and even shows the config files one needs.  I haven't tried any this
yet, so perhaps tor alone is enough.

Perhaps, if you have the time, you could take a look at this and see
what you think.

http://sidux.com/index.php?module=pnWikka&tag=NetzwerkTorPrivoxyInstallEN

I'll try it tomorrow most likely.  I am curious if it will let me watch
some content limited to residents of the US and Canada.  I am not
optimistic, and should probably spend my time doing more constructive
things than watching tv, even if it is on my computer.

Joe

- --
Registerd Linux user #443289 at http://counter.li.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGAZiCiXBCVWpc5J4RAlgUAJ44KG3TRDaJ8sgS/IKXrZWW+kMRygCeJCWL
d6o/sOd9dLUJlfQvmcbE810=
=JtXB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: