Re: Ping: Curt Howland
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> Curt Howland wrote:
> > I do not have a problem with "broken" threads, since, not only do
> > I read the digest, I read the Subject line.
Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.ca>
> So you don't mind taking a shit in the bed because you don't have
> to sleep in it. Classy, Curt. Real classy.
Not at all. It's an annoying action, and if it were in the context of
anything but a personal attack and massively off-topic threads, I
might feel some remorse.
I'm actually just a bit flattered that anyone gives a damn.
> > While you're looking for scapegoats, why not blame Kmail for not
> > having a "reply to encapsulated message" button?
>
> It does.
Shall I post the screen shots?
> Highlight the encapsulated message in the parts handler,
> the encapsulated message will appear in the preview pane. You can
> then reply, reply to all or reply to list as usual.
It Does Not Work. All I get is the digest subject aggregate text, and
a subject line of "Re: debian-user-digest Digest V2007 #730". I've
tried the reply button, I've tried the "reply" button at the top
toolbar while that particular body part is displayed, highlighted,
selected, I've tried right-click context menus on the "body part", on
the "encapsulated message", within the "encapsulated message", and
nothing replies to the message itself. Only the digest.
Yes, the text in the main message windows (preview pane? ok) changes,
but the reply always contains the digest headers.
I really want to thank you, however, for trying. I appreciate it. I do
indeed wish it had worked, and I would gladly eat crow and tell
everyone how wonderful your advice is. Really.
And if I can find a way to do it (thank you again for the pointer,
maybe somewhere in the kmail docs it will show up), I will use it.
Really.
Wish me luck.
Curt-
- --
September 11th, 2001
The proudest day for gun control and central
planning advocates in American history
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iQEUAwUBRfCxPS9Y35yItIgBAQKprwf0DDIsqAjMmwvGAMBFyBgj7zi0hzFRaDEL
RizdFFbP9FC7ElEZ11cZOwz/gWQxpEC76HqItrISeOOVcyF7W33dBkwDAngDJ4E5
4lBprg+kUGAWbL0leJxWNvcWQ8yP0ScWocBLzIJUqZHn9hgxZzvbeShvZ40BHAZt
x0oMsuBac+ENAsqKlYiPhi9yUKRBBmCU34q5SpipI0VtSwWlno9Sff5BR4NIyp18
4gzKdoc5uaSJdw955huPKfDinTIsJxKjmVr+c5+2XvdUHOygnb2aC1KbRaXjBP3e
/Bv4yMSiCg+38bGaytPYKKdkkk/jp98BAPMqU2pN7I6rKsDZjfEp
=Tz1n
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: