Re: Audio recording hardware
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 03/01/07 13:44, Andrew Perrin wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 22:11:04 -0600
>> "Russell L. Harris" <rlharris@oplink.net> wrote:
>>> * Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> [070228 18:21]:
[snip]
> http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/furutech/rd1.html
>
> But I have to say that it strikes me as quite bizarre, frankly. The idea
> is that somehow magnetization of impurities in the label and aluminum
> layers will cause the laser to fail more frequently, thereby invoking
Since when does aluminum get magnetized?
> the error-correction circuitry, thereby resulting in loss of sound
> quality. This ought to be fairly easily testable by reading binary data
> repeatedly from a CD, instead of the shenanigans the review goes to to
> evaluate the sound quality on output. But I would think any even
> vaguely modern (say, 20 years old or less) CD player would have
> sufficient buffering to make this problem a nonissue.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFF5zfiS9HxQb37XmcRApgdAJ9nuPGRScit7fg8bMjCyg7/zLiPzACfZxeK
4C71KBY4jDWdQBGWFnvd1cs=
=aHIt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: