Re: relationship between debian's wiki and newbiedoc's wiki

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: relationship between debian's wiki and newbiedoc's wiki
From: Andrei Popescu <andreimpopescu@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 00:00:07 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20070205000007.7218a43f@think.homenet>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20070204213606.GF9830@titan>
References: <[🔎] 20070203220537.GA13231@titan> <[🔎] 45C645BD.7040400@untrammelled.co.uk> <[🔎] 20070204213606.GF9830@titan>

On Sun, 4 Feb 2007 16:36:06 -0500
Douglas Allan Tutty <dtutty@porchlight.ca> wrote:

> If you changed the licence to be DFSG compliant, I would be happy to
> contribute.  Then again, if you did that, perhaps NewbieDoc's wiki
> could be merged to Debian's.

GFDL is considered DFSG compliant as long as the document doesn't have
unmodifiable parts:

http://www.debian.org/News/2006/20060316

Regards,
Andrei
-- 
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert Einstein)

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: relationship between debian's wiki and newbiedoc's wiki
  - From: Chris Lale <chrislale@untrammelled.co.uk>

References:
- relationship between debian's wiki and newbiedoc's wiki
  - From: Douglas Allan Tutty <dtutty@porchlight.ca>
- Re: relationship between debian's wiki and newbiedoc's wiki
  - From: Chris Lale <chrislale@untrammelled.co.uk>
- Re: relationship between debian's wiki and newbiedoc's wiki
  - From: Douglas Allan Tutty <dtutty@porchlight.ca>

Prev by Date: Re: Installation problem: No partitionable media found
Next by Date: Re: Attracting newbies (Was Booting Debian/testing fails)
Previous by thread: Re: relationship between debian's wiki and newbiedoc's wiki
Next by thread: Re: relationship between debian's wiki and newbiedoc's wiki
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread