Re: Etch becoming slower than Sarge?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Etch becoming slower than Sarge?
From: Andrei Popescu <andreimpopescu@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 23:05:12 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20070104230512.70ea5320@think.homenet>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 459D67F4.5010508@dsl.pipex.com>
References: <[🔎] a0c4f6270701040604j4520bfccyc175570db172dbfa@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] a24316f30701041207h3d66a4b9pe154b00c8d62b2b5@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 459D67F4.5010508@dsl.pipex.com>

On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 20:47:48 +0000
andy <geek_show@dsl.pipex.com> wrote:

> As an aside, having just double checked, I am supposed to be running
> 1GB of RAM but it is only showing a total of 758MB. Is this typical
> rounding off and 1GB is in reality only 758MB, or is it typical for
> the full amount not to be shown? Seems like missing 250MB of RAM is a
> fair chunk to not show up. What gives?

Does it show up at in the post messages? Shared video memory? What
about dmesg?

Regards,
Andrei
-- 
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert Einstein)

Reply to:

References:
- Etch becoming slower than Sarge?
  - From: "Kumar Appaiah" <akumar@ee.iitm.ac.in>
- Re: Etch becoming slower than Sarge?
  - From: "Łukasz Andrzejak" <landrzejak@gmail.com>
- Re: Etch becoming slower than Sarge?
  - From: andy <geek_show@dsl.pipex.com>

Prev by Date: Re: unable to parse package file; aptitude effectively dead.
Next by Date: Re: mkinitramfs-kpkg failed to create initrd image.
Previous by thread: Re: Etch becoming slower than Sarge?
Next by thread: Re: Etch becoming slower than Sarge?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread