Re: Etch becoming slower than Sarge?

To: "Andrew Sackville-West" <andrew@farwestbilliards.com>, debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Etch becoming slower than Sarge?
From: "Kumar Appaiah" <kumar.appaiah@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 21:56:25 +0530
Message-id: <[🔎] a0c4f6270701040826s312bef4bw92b87a01ab7604fa@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20070104160601.GD21677@localhost.localdomain>
References: <[🔎] a0c4f6270701040604j4520bfccyc175570db172dbfa@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20070104160601.GD21677@localhost.localdomain>

On 04/01/07, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:

maybe its a memory issue? My understanding is that the etch kernel is
much bigger than the sarge kernel. that is entirely anecdotal as I
have no sarge box to compare to.


Do you think I should suggest compiling a new kernel, lean? Of course,
I thought the stock kernel Debian provides were modular anyway, but if
you think this'd help, I'll try it out.

Thanks.

Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
462, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600036

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Etch becoming slower than Sarge?
  - From: Andrew Sackville-West <andrew@farwestbilliards.com>

References:
- Etch becoming slower than Sarge?
  - From: "Kumar Appaiah" <akumar@ee.iitm.ac.in>
- Re: Etch becoming slower than Sarge?
  - From: Andrew Sackville-West <andrew@farwestbilliards.com>

Prev by Date: Re: unable to parse package file; aptitude effectively dead.
Next by Date: Re: IP Address networking - best way?
Previous by thread: Re: Etch becoming slower than Sarge?
Next by thread: Re: Etch becoming slower than Sarge?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread